Hedging language
Softens strong claims with words like might, perhaps, sort of.
Asks: Does this text unnecessarily hedge or soften its claims with words like 'might', 'perhaps', 'somewhat', 'I think', or 'sort of'?
No → States claims directly (pass)
Each built-in check is one closed question for Jev. Yes/No checks come back as a probability; option checks as a pick with a probability per option. Add your own from the judge.
Jev returns the probability that the answer is yes. The check decides which answer counts as a problem.
Softens strong claims with words like might, perhaps, sort of.
Asks: Does this text unnecessarily hedge or soften its claims with words like 'might', 'perhaps', 'somewhat', 'I think', or 'sort of'?
Leans on em dashes (—) where a comma, period, or parentheses would do.
Asks: Does this text overuse em dashes (—) where simpler punctuation such as commas or periods would work better?
Is the main point obvious within the first two sentences?
Asks: Is the main point of this text clear within the first two sentences?
Phrases that add words but no meaning.
Asks: Does this text contain filler phrases that add no meaning, such as 'at the end of the day', 'it is important to note', or 'it's worth mentioning'?
Hides who did what ('mistakes were made').
Asks: Does this text rely too heavily on passive voice, hiding who is responsible for actions?
Jev chooses one option and returns a probability for every option plus a confidence in the pick.
Is the register formal, casual, or an inconsistent mix?
Asks: What is the overall tone of this text?
Does the reader know what to do next? Handy for emails and meeting notes.
Asks: How clearly does this text state the next steps or actions the reader should take?
Write your own question, choose Yes/No or a list of options, and say which answer counts as a problem. They're saved in this browser and run alongside the built-ins.